Fighter formations and defensive!

I noticed that in this age lack the ability to put troops in training, this is very important because now the troops are so spread out, and this principal is negative because they are more exposed to attacks and die more easily! While putting them in formation come in a more orderly and avoid having unnecessary losses!

What do you think?|||I would welcome the ability to use different formations like in previous AOE games. But there are still bigger issues that need to be solved first.|||

I think my elephant archers, catapults and other stupidly powerful AoE units would like a word with your formations. I think the thing your looking for are stances, agressive, defencive, and stand ground in perticular.

Currently we only have suicidal and hold ground which are both pretty worthless when it comes to practical application, suicidal lives up to it's name and stand ground has a similar effect because they don't actually fight back before it's too late. Having more archers in your army helps with insanely agressive melee units, simply because the archers kill the offending unit quickly so your melee units don't have anything to chase.

Stances would be nice though, formations I don't see the point. They walk in a column, form a block when they get close and fan out when they are trying to kill things. I don't see the purpose of being able to manually put them in a wedge shape if half my units are going to stay in formation instead of attacking, and if they are going to fan out anyway, who cares?

|||So if good memories in age 2 there is a Staggered Formation that the troops are n group, but each one a little more dstante other. Be excellent in this training and age 2 wagons against the Koreans, etc. ballistae. In fact, with this lineup and minimal damage! So I would say that 1 training like this and many others will certainly look for a utility!